Blog

WRC-15: the beginning of the end for regional agreements?

That’s the question PolicyTracker would like to ask, having digested the results of our survey on the outcomes of WRC-15. It is, of course, a slightly glib one.
| PolicyTracker

But the lack of consensus in Region 1 over IMT identification in the upper reaches of the C-band, an area which looked destined to be troublesome, and the patchwork agreement for mobile in the lower part of UHF, does raise questions about cohesion.

The different uses of technology across the world could answer some questions on the fragmentation of regional understanding. The expense of a new set-top box or television for consumers in developed countries, for example, is a trifle (and often a state-subsidised one) compared with poorer countries. In richer countries, analogue TV is being superseded not just by digital terrestrial TV (DTT), but also by satellite, cable and IPTV: the global contrasts in TV viewing platforms have never been sharper. 

Politics also played their part in the ructions we saw at WRC-15. As Region 1 identification of 3.6-3.7 GHz was debated at the conference, there was word from more than one delegate that the RCC group of countries (Russia plus a number of eastern European and central Asian states) was willing to lend its support to the position of Europe’s chief negotiator CEPT. By all accounts the offer was on the table. Until it wasn’t. It’s difficult to know why it disappeared but some were left wondering if it was absolutely necessary that it did.

Patchwork consensus was achieved on a variety of issues, not least the US, Colombia, Costa Rica and Canada’s identification of 3.6-3.7 GHz for IMT. The same countries (with Mexico replacing Costa Rica) also identified the UHF band for IMT. If large markets like these can harmonise, does regional consensus really matter? Indeed, a smaller country without identification could well find it easier to get IMT up and running if they’re in the backyard of a market like China. 

Writing regional harmony into the Radio Regulations may be tricky, but in the real world it may just develop naturally.

Kane Mumford, PolicyTracker

Img Alt

Newsletter

Discover why hundreds of regulators and technology companies use our services

SUBSCRIBE
Comments
Opinion: A geographic split is the worst possible sharing option for the upper 6 GHz band
The problem is that an identification..." by Stefan Zehle
Dec 20, 2024
Albanian regulator launches 3.6 GHz auction
Albanian regulator AKEP has announced..." by Jaroslaw Adamowski
Nov 26, 2024
DirecTV/EchoStar deal could pave the way for Dish’s 5G network
Update: On 21 November, 2024, Reuters..." by Dugie Standeford
Nov 22, 2024
Mexican regulator assigns MSS spectrum but its future remains uncertain
Update: Globalstar confirmed that they..." by Laura Sear
Nov 19, 2024
Elon Musk backs call to auction UHF spectrum
Thanks Richard, now amended." by Jonathan Watson
Nov 05, 2024