Blog

New satellite D2D-IMT research note added

Should satellite D2D-IMT connectivity count towards mobile network coverage obligations?

| Jonathan Watson

Mobile network operators around the world are teaming up with satellite companies such as SpaceX (Starlink), AST SpaceMobile and Lynk Global to develop direct-to-device (D2D) services based on licensed mobile spectrum.

D2D-IMT promises service continuity in places beyond the reach of terrestrial mobile networks, such as in remote and mountainous areas, but will regulators allow supplemental satellite-based coverage to count towards mobile operators’ network rollout obligations, now or in the future?

So far, the FCC’s D2D-IMT framework has ruled this out, and Canada’s forthcoming rules similarly bar service providers from counting satellite-based D2D-IMT coverage towards their mobile network construction requirements.

However, satellite-based networks have long been touted as the best way to provide coverage in the most sparsely populated and difficult-to-reach areas that are uneconomical to cover with terrestrial mobile networks. And with satellite D2D, expensive satellite terminals are no longer required; the service is designed to work with unmodified smartphones.

This suggests it’s time for regulators to weigh up how new services such as D2D-IMT can contribute to improving mobile coverage and plan ahead for any regulatory work that’s required.

The new research note is now available to Spectrum Research Service subscribers.

Img Alt

Newsletter

Discover why hundreds of regulators and technology companies use our services

SUBSCRIBE
Comments
Two European candidates to run for top spectrum job at ITU
India have proposed a canditate as well..." by Peter Gent
Apr 16, 2025
Operators disagree with Ofcom’s annual licence fees
This article has been updated to..." by Laura Sear
Apr 10, 2025
UK considers upper 1.4 GHz auction
The Danish Agency for Digital..." by Laura Sear
Feb 07, 2025
Moldova launches multiband 4G, 5G spectrum auction
The Moldovan regulator has announced..." by Jarosław Adamowski
Feb 03, 2025
Opinion: A geographic split is the worst possible sharing option for the upper 6 GHz band
The problem is that an identification..." by Stefan Zehle
Dec 20, 2024